Meredith Whitfield, Field Museum, USA
Over four million people online participate in making and using Internet memes of art: they interact with works of art, many of them museum objects, as part of their everyday lives, without institutional prompting. This session presents research on six months worth of art memes, providing an introduction to the practice and discussion of meme literacies, as well as a framework to understand meming as a mode of engagement with art.
The session also theorizes methods museums might use to observe and understand this practice as part of new engagement strategies and kindles discussion about how templated interactions prompt participation.
Arvanitis, Konstantinos. “Museums Outside Walls: Mobile Phones and the Museum in the Everyday.” IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning 2005 (2005): 251–255. Print.
Bauckhage, Christian. “Insights into Internet Memes.” Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. N.p., 2011. 42–49. Print.
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. Routledge, London and New York, 2000.
Milner, Ryan M. “The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Participatory Media.” University of Kansas, 2012. Print.
Miltner, Kate M. “‘There’s No Place for Lulz on LOLcats’: The Role of Genre, Gender, and Group Identity in the Interpretation and Enjoyment of an Internet Meme.” First Monday 19.8 (2014): n. pag. Print.
Shifman, Limor. “The Cultural Logic of Photo-Based Meme Genres.” Journa 13.3 (2014): 340–358. Web.
Shifman, Limor. Memes In Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. Web.
Shifman, Limor. “Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (2013): n. pag. Web.
Wiggins, Bradley E, and G Bret Bowers. “Memes as Genre: A Structurational Analysis of the Memescape.” 17.11 (2015): 1886–1906. Web.
Сапанжа, О С, Д Е Ершова, and Современных Арт-мемах. “General Theory of Signs in Relation to Linguistics. Semiology. Semiotics (UDC 81`22).” 2.10 (2017): 7–9. Print.